Internal Controversy Surrounding Kaiser Neuropsychologist Kimberly E. Lanni Deepens
December 10, 2025 Contact: Alex S. Johnson — georgebailey679@gmail.com Location: Carmichael, California
Internal Controversy Surrounding Kaiser Neuropsychologist Kimberly E. Lanni Deepens
Carmichael, CA — New developments continue to emerge regarding Kaiser Permanente neuropsychologist Kimberly E. Lanni, whose past autism research at the U.C. Davis MIND Institute has already drawn sharp criticism.
Early Controversy: The 2011 Thesis
In her 2011 PhD thesis, co‑authored with mentor Blythe Corbett, Lanni described subjecting autistic children to “mild restraint” and simulated MRI noise exposure. Autism experts, including neuroscientist David Putrino, condemned these methods as outdated and harmful, linking them to the discredited paradigm of UCLA researcher Dr. Ivar Lovaas.
Patient Complaints at Kaiser
Following her academic work, Lanni’s clinical career at Kaiser Permanente’s Roseville facility has been marked by patient complaints alleging records falsification and other transgressions. Despite these concerns, she has remained employed, fueling criticism of Kaiser’s oversight and its broader treatment of autistic patients.
Departmental Discontent
Sources close to the investigation now reveal that Lanni is controversial even within her own department. Colleagues reportedly describe her as “wildly disliked” due to a rigid, authoritarian personality that has strained professional relationships. This internal backlash suggests that concerns about her conduct extend beyond patient complaints to her workplace environment.
Employment Status Uncertain
There are indications that Lanni either has been, or may soon be, released from her duties at Kaiser Permanente. However, these reports remain unconfirmed. Kaiser has not issued any official statement addressing the internal controversy or clarifying her employment status.
Kaiser’s Silence and Broader Criticism
Kaiser Permanente’s silence has intensified criticism from autism advocates and patient rights groups, who argue that the organization has failed to adequately address harmful practices and protect vulnerable patients. The continued employment of Lanni, despite mounting concerns, is seen as emblematic of systemic issues in Kaiser’s approach to autism care.
Call to Action
Anyone with information about autism research conducted at the U.C. Davis MIND Institute by Blythe Corbett and Kimberly E. Lanni, or with knowledge of Kaiser Permanente’s handling of related complaints, is urged to contact:
Alex S. Johnson Email: georgebailey679@gmail.com
